Schütze 1997 combines research on the suitability of the adult language with the study of language learning. Anagnostopoulou 2003 is an innovative case study of how concordance (as well as doubling) can influence the understanding of the syntax of a particular construction, in this case the ditransigeante verbal sentence. Wechsler and Zlatić 2003 present a theory of agreement that is situated within the Head-Driven Expression Structure Grammar (HPSG) and the Lexical-Functional Grammar (LFG) Frameworks, paying particular attention to discourse phenomena and information on agreement resolution in The Coordinations. Modern English is not very consistent, although it exists. Agreement or concord (abbreviated agr) occurs when a word changes shape, depending on the other words it refers to.  This is a case of inflection and normally implies that the value of a grammatical category (such as gender or person) „matches“ between different words or parts of the sentence. Case agreement is not an essential feature of English (only personnel pronouns and pronouns that have casus marking). The agreement between these pronouns can sometimes be observed: Although their name does not immediately reveal it, this work is a case study on the interaction of verbal concordance in Tagalog with the syntax of remote extraction that offers a fascinating perspective on the often expressed intuition that certain types of concordance are necessary precursors for certain types of syntactic movements. A study on the models of agreements found in Arabic, particularly relevant for the asymmetries of agreements in the word codes SV and VS (see also the resolution of the agreement in the coordinations). Spoken French always distinguishes the plural from the second person and the first person plural in formal language and from the rest of the present in all verbs in the first conjugation (Infinitive in -er) except . . .
Function Of Grammatical Agreement
Dieser Beitrag wurde unter Allgemein veröffentlicht. Setze ein Lesezeichen auf den Permalink.