I also find the use of the plural form with collective subtantes problematic. One of the examples cited (the team was satisfied with its presentations) raises the question of the use of „sound“ as a preposition pronoun. If „the team“ is considered a singular, then the correct pronoun would be to give „he“ „The team was happy with its presentations.“ This seems to me to be quite acceptable, even if the prepositional name „presentations“ is plural. This appears to run counter to the alleged principle that the case is based on plurality or not on prepositional-Nov. In our opinion, common sense tells us that if the subject is one, one must use a singular verb. As we said in our blog Rules and Preferences, „we are all entitled to our preferences – even our prejudices – but explain them, everyone has to live, cross a line.“ Use the plural help verb do with the plural noun. Our article What Does vs. What Do has more information about these confusing verbs. Note: In this example, the object of the sentence is even; That is why the verb must agree. (Because scissors are the subject of the preposition, scissors have no influence on the verb number.) The sentences in this form are more difficult than the examples above, because the verb immediately follows the plural noun, while the subject is undeniably singular and is imposed by the article. He envy those whose popular language was only „was“ as in „she was duck…. An independent clause is a group of words that contains a subject and a verb and expresses complete thought. 1.
A sentence or clause between the subject and the verb does not change the subject`s number. What about the „purpose“ nomin? In this case, it is the subject of a proceeding. Now a process involves a variety of steps, practices and procedures, and therefore its purpose is complex. When I said „The purpose of the process is, (a, b, c and d.)“ the text editor corrected to „goals.“ Not sure I agree as one – d are all parts of the goal, not items you can choose. What do you think about it? I do not respectfully agree with your use of the plural form when it concerns „team or staff.“ Recently, I heard a national television reporter use a plural verb when he was referring to a married couple — she used it twice. This is what led me to deal with it, because it is at odds with what I learned in public school (1937-1950). I realize that language is developing, but I will continue to use the singular verb with all the collective subtantifs, and if I listen, it will continue to rub me on the nerves. People are NOT a collective nobiss like team or staff. It`s a plural name. However, the subject is one that is singular and adopts a singular verb.
So the answer is. In the sentence above, the preposition is the four-person expression. This means that people are pre-positioned. „The 2012 Senior Class announces its starting exercises.“ The correct phrase is that nearly one in four people in the world is Muslim. The subject of the sentence is one that is singular and adopts a singular verb. The rule you write about only applies to collective nouns. The word one is not a collective noun, it is a unique name. In the sentence A family of ducks rested on the grass, the object of the sentence is the family, a collective name. In this case, the author may decide to use a singular or plural verb depending on whether he considers the „family“ as a unit or as a unique being within that unity. I ask because, although „man“ is plural, „one of the men“ indicates a singular object that would require the use of a singular verb. A collective bite is a nostun made up of more than one person, an animal, a place, an idea or a thing. The family, for example, is a collective effort.
It represents a unit or a group, but it consists of more than one person.